The Institute of Social & Economic Research

The Alaska Citizen's Guide to the Budget

Financial Assistance
provided by:

Fiscal Policy Council of Alaska

Comparisons
Cash on the Street
Labor Cost
Grants to Local Govt
Payments to Individuals
Purchases from Business
Inflation Proofing, etc.
Intragovernmental Charges
Appropriations to COTS
Economic Impact of COTS
 
 
 

 

 

2. Cash on the Street

2.4 Purchases from Private Businesses—$1.789 billion in 1999

The largest piece of the recipients' pie, about $1.8 billion, was paid to private businesses for the purchase of services, supplies, and equipment. The majority of that, $1.2 billion, came out of the capital budget and about $600 million came out of the operating budget.

CAPITAL BUDGET

Most of the money flowing to private companies from the capital budget was designated to pay for construction-related goods and services while a small amount was used for the purchase of capital equipment. Appropriations are for projects, some of which take several years to complete. A glimpse at the budget gives a flavor of where the money went. The 10 largest projects, which accounted for over 25% of the capital budget, were the following:

10 Largest Construction Projects
(million $)

Anchorage International Airport Expansion

$ 179
Energy Projects of Dept of Community and Regional Affairs
$ 30
Anchorage International Airport Road Interchange
$ 25
Ketchikan Gravina Island Bridge
$ 20
Whittier Access
$ 18
Anchorage International Airport Runway
$ 17
Municipal Capital Matching Grants
$ 13
Buckland School
$ 12
University of Alaska Fairbanks Library
$ 12
4 Dam Hydroelectric Repairs
$ 12
Source: 1999 Budget

 

There were an additional 1,007 separate projects identified in the capital budget ranging in size down to less than $10 thousand. The next table shows that most capital projects are less than $1 million, although a few large projects get most of the dollars.

Size Distribution of Capital Projects

Size

Number

Portion of Dollar Value

$10 million or more

14

38%

$1 to $9.99 million

231

48%

$ .100 to $.999 million

439

13%

$50 to $99 thousand

88

.5%

Less than $50 thousand

245

.5%

Source: 1999 Budget.

These dollars are a major source of revenue for the construction industry as well as for other sectors such as engineering services, transportation, financial services, and wholesale trade.

To give some perspective on the size of this contribution to activity in the construction industry, we can roughly estimate total construction industry receipts in 1997 and compare that with the $1.2 billion state capital budget. Using the reported wages paid to construction workers in 1997 of $600 million and a rule of thumb that 1/4 of construction industry receipts is paid out in wages, we can estimate total construction industry receipts of $2.4 billion. If capital spending were all pumped into the construction industry, it would represent 50% of the total and 50% of the 9,600 construction industry jobs.

OPERATING BUDGET

About $600 million out of the $3.5 billion spent on government operations ($3.5 billion was the operating budget net of duplicated appropriations) was paid to private businesses for providing goods and services to the state. The largest share, over $250 million was contracts, followed by commodities and equipment, over $150 million. Typical of the activities of state government that rely on contracts are the University and the Permanent Fund Corporation that paid over $35 million in management fees. The University and the Department of Transportation generate a large share of the commodity and equipment purchases. The only other category of expenditures made up primarily of purchases from private businesses was travel at $43 million.

Site Map
 
Top ^

Next >

Fiscal Policy Papers

About ISER


Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of Alaska Anchorage
Mailing Address: 3211 Providence Drive, Anchorage, Alaska 99508
Physical Address: 4500 Diplomacy Drive, Suite 501, Anchorage, Alaska
 
(907)786-7710

Page Updated April 16, 2003

Other Resources
Send a Comment
 © Copyright 2011, Institute of Social and Economic Research