|
|
3. Budget History
3.3
Total State Outlays
Some people feel the
trend in general fund spending does not adequately represent the growth
in state spending because it ignores the growth in other parts of the
budget. The U.S. Department of Commerce data showing the history of total
state government outlays (appropriations that actually hit the street)
provide one way to measure growth in total government spending over time;
also see the next section on appropriations.
(See also the Comparison
to the U.S. average.)
Total state government
outlays as reported by the U.S. Department of Commerce have continued
to grow. (What is included in outlays?)
Total
Alaska State Government Outlays
(million $) |
| 1990 |
$ 4,284 |
| 1991 |
$ 4,493 |
| 1992 |
$ 4,788 |
| 1993 |
$ 4,934 |
| 1994 |
$ 5,256 |
| 1995 |
$ 5,047 |
| 1996 |
$ 5,105 |
| 1997 |
$ 5,160 |
| 1998 |
$ 5,230 |
| 1999 |
$5,572 |
| Source: U.S. Department of Commerce,
Governmental Finances. |
If we
net out the Permanent Fund dividend, which the federal government includes
in its definition of state government outlays, we see that there was a
break in the growth of state outlays in 1994 and that they have been flat
since that time.
Alaska
State Government Outlays—
Net of PF Dividend
(million $) |
| FY |
Outlays |
Outlays
Net Dividend |
| 1990 |
$ 4,284 |
$3,797 |
| 1991 |
$4,493 |
$4,004 |
| 1992 |
$4,788 |
$4,300 |
| 1993 |
$4,934 |
$4,402 |
| 1994 |
$5,256 |
$4,701 |
| 1995 |
$5,047 |
$4,482 |
| 1996 |
$5,105 |
$4,462 |
| 1997 |
$5,160 |
$4,413 |
| 1998 |
$5,230 |
$4,337 |
| 1999 |
$5,572 |
$4,599 |
| Source: U.S. Department of Commerce,
Governmental Finances, and ISER. |
Furthermore, if we
subtract federal grants from outlays, we see that "Outlays from Own
Sources" has been growing more slowly than total outlays.
| Alaska
State Government Outlays from Own Sources—
Net of PF Dividend & Federal Grants
(million $) |
| FY |
Outlays
|
Outlays
from Own Sources (Net Dividend and Federal Grants) |
| 1990 |
$4,284 |
$3,174 |
| 1991 |
$4,493 |
$3,297 |
| 1992 |
$4,788 |
$3,427 |
| 1993 |
$4,934 |
$3,497 |
| 1994 |
$5,256 |
$3,781 |
| 1995 |
$5,047 |
$3,502 |
| 1996 |
$5,105 |
$3,445 |
| 1997 |
$5,160 |
$3,371 |
| 1998 |
$5,230 |
$3,257 |
| 1999 |
$5,572 |
$3,658 |
| Source: U.S. Department of Commerce,
Governmental Finances, and ISER. |
If outlays
in early years are converted to 1998 purchasing power (real 1998 $), we
see that outlays excluding the Permanent Fund dividend have been trending
downward, as have been outlays from own sources (net of the dividend and
outlays financed by federal grants).
Alaska
State Government Outlays
(millions of 1998 $) |
| FY |
Outlays
from Own Sources (Net Dividend and Federal Grants) |
Outlays
Net Dividend |
Outlays |
Anchorage
Consumer Price Index
|
| 1990 |
$ 3,922 |
$4,692 |
$5,294 |
118.4 |
| 1991 |
$ 3,897 |
$4,731 |
$5,310 |
123.8 |
| 1992 |
$ 4,031 |
$4,915 |
$5,473 |
128 |
| 1993 |
$ 3,876 |
$4,879 |
$5,468 |
132 |
| 1994 |
$ 4,104 |
$5,102 |
$5,705 |
134.8 |
| 1995 |
$ 3,699 |
$4,735 |
$5,332 |
138.5 |
| 1996 |
$ 3,539 |
$4,584 |
$5,244 |
142.4 |
| 1997 |
$ 3,413 |
$4,468 |
$5,225 |
144.5 |
| 1998 |
$ 3,257 |
$4,337 |
$5,230 |
146.3 |
| 1999 |
$3,618 |
$4,549 |
$5,512 |
147.9 |
| Source: U.S. Department of Commerce,
Governmental Finances, and ISER. |
The trend in real
per capita outlays has been clearly downward. Even including the Permanent
Fund dividend, which has been increasing, real per capita outlays have
been falling since the late 1980s. Real per capita outlays are now at
the same level they were in about 1979.
Alaska
State Government
Per Capita Outlays
(1998 $) |
| |
Outlays
from Own Sources (Net Dividend and Federal Grants) |
Outlays
Net Dividend |
Outlays |
Anchorage
Consumer Price Index |
| 1990 |
$7,131 |
$8,530 |
$9,625 |
118.4 |
| 1991 |
$7,045 |
$8,554 |
$9,600 |
123.8 |
| 1992 |
$7,084 |
$8,636 |
$9,617 |
128 |
| 1993 |
$6,607 |
$8,316 |
$9,321 |
132 |
| 1994 |
$6,876 |
$8,548 |
$9,558 |
134.8 |
| 1995 |
$6,158 |
$7,881 |
$8,875 |
138.5 |
| 1996 |
$5,882 |
$7,619 |
$8,717 |
142.4 |
| 1997 |
$5,641 |
$7,385 |
$8,635 |
144.5 |
| 1998 |
$5,305 |
$7,064 |
$8,518 |
146.3 |
| 1999 |
$5,836 |
$7,337 |
$8,890 |
147.9 |
| Source: U.S. Department of Commerce,
Governmental Finances, and ISER. |
State outlays as a
share of personal income have been decreasing, although they are still
much higher than at any time before the "petrodollar" boom.
One line of reasoning suggests that there should be a stable relationship
between public spending and personal income, reflecting a balance between
public and private consumption.
| Outlays
as a Percentage of Personal Income |
| |
Outlays
from Own Sources (Net Dividend and Federal Grants) |
Outlays
Net Dividend |
Outlays |
Personal
Income (million $) |
| 1990 |
25% |
30% |
34% |
$12,566 |
| 1991 |
25% |
30% |
34% |
$13,243 |
| 1992 |
25% |
31% |
34% |
$14,039 |
| 1993 |
24% |
30% |
33% |
$14,789 |
| 1994 |
25% |
31% |
35% |
$15,168 |
| 1995 |
23% |
29% |
33% |
$15,513 |
| 1996 |
22% |
28% |
32% |
$15,762 |
| 1997 |
21% |
27% |
31% |
$16,433 |
| 1998 |
19% |
25% |
31% |
$17,124 |
| 1999 |
21% |
26% |
32% |
$17,670 |
| Source: U.S. Department of Commerce,
Governmental Finances and Bureau of Economic Analysis, and ISER. |
State outlays have
increased as a share of gross state product—value added. We can
think of gross product as the tax base for the state.
| Outlays
as a Percentage of Gross State Product |
| FY |
Outlays
from Own Sources (Net Dividend and Federal Grants) |
Outlays
Net Dividend |
Outlays |
Gross
State Product (million $) |
| 1990 |
12% |
15% |
17% |
$ 25,787 |
| 1991 |
14% |
17% |
19% |
$23,947 |
| 1992 |
14% |
17% |
19% |
$24,609 |
| 1993 |
15% |
19% |
21% |
$23,435 |
| 1994 |
16% |
20% |
22% |
$23,622 |
| 1995 |
14% |
18% |
20% |
$24,790 |
| 1996 |
13% |
17% |
20% |
$26,084 |
| 1997 |
13% |
17% |
20% |
$25,581 |
| 1998 |
15% |
20% |
24% |
$22,051 |
| 1999 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
| Source: U.S. Department
of Commerce, Governmental Finances, and ISER. |
Total public (state
+ local government) outlays as reported by the U.S. Department of
Commerce have been increasing more slowly than state-only outlays because
local government budgets have been growing more slowly than the state's.
Tables reporting the combined outlays will be added to this section in
the near future.
|